Author Topic: AR- 15 vs. AK-47  (Read 7979 times)

Offline Outonowhere

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 1353
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #100 on: September 16, 2011, 08:28:38 PM »
                                  *facepalm*

I'm still waiting for that one ^

*Walks away*

 [url=http://yoursmiles.org/p-m
"A GREAT CONTRADICTION IS THE BELIEF IN STATES RIGHTS WHILE NOT SUPPORTING THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL."  - Me
Han shot first!

Offline sledge

  • Community Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2328
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #101 on: September 16, 2011, 09:39:15 PM »
Yeah guys!  Why do we have TWO AK47 icons, and yet we have no, M4 or M16 icon?   ???

Not cool guys, not cool at all.


I'm sorry guys.  I seriously am.  I just can't help it. I'm LMAO right now with tears in my eyes and I can't seem to stop.  Somebody help me!  It's starting to hurt!  :))   :'(    :))    :'(



In the pursuit of liberty, many will fall. In the pursuit of fascism, many will be against the wall..........   Courtesy of Xydaco

Offline thatGuy

  • Kind Lover
  • Community Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3454
  • Karma: +12/-0
    • thatGuy's youtube
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #102 on: September 17, 2011, 03:34:25 AM »
We figured that we didn't need and M4/AR emoticon because a guy who owns a M4/AR wants for nothing else... but more ammo!

Offline NOLA556

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 2048
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #103 on: September 17, 2011, 12:15:55 PM »
I was going to find out today if the Tul steel cased stuff worked well with my M4 because I was about to buy a crap load of it from wal-mart.

Well anyway, I chose to do my video response to That Guy today instead, but I'm about to find out soon how the steel case works in my M4. 

It should be fine, because mine is mil-spec and is chromed lined so it should be all good to go.   

I shot alot of steel cased stuff when I first got my AR. My rifle ate it just fine but you just gotta make sure you clean your chamber well. The only problems I had happened when I switched from steel to brass in the same session/range trip. the brass kept getting stuck in the chamber, i guess from the laquer shit that's on the steel cased stuff melted off and caked up the chamber. i don't really know for sure, but I stopped shooting steel cased and I've never had the problem again.
Rome is burning, and Obama is playing the fiddle - GAP

Offline sledge

  • Community Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2328
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #104 on: September 17, 2011, 12:58:00 PM »
We figured that we didn't need and M4/AR emoticon because a guy who owns a M4/AR wants for nothing else... but more ammo!

I like AR guys.  They're faithful and loyal to their platform almost to a T.  I know it's got to be killing them to have you use an AK icon. 

Uh, oh, this is gonna start me laughing all over again.  I better stop before I give myself a hernia or something.



In the pursuit of liberty, many will fall. In the pursuit of fascism, many will be against the wall..........   Courtesy of Xydaco

Offline RONSERESURPLUS

  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #105 on: September 17, 2011, 06:33:56 PM »
SORRY ALL, i'M ONE OF THOSE ak AND ar GUYS AND iT IS STILL CRACKING ME UP?

RON

Offline Veritas

  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #106 on: September 17, 2011, 08:25:06 PM »
SORRY ALL, i'M ONE OF THOSE ak AND ar GUYS AND iT IS STILL CRACKING ME UP?

RON


Same here.  [URL=http://www.smileyvault.co
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but my Kalashnikov will hurt you.

"Don't wish ill for your enemy, plan it."

Offline mountainredneck2051

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 1491
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #107 on: September 17, 2011, 11:21:42 PM »
We figured that we didn't need and M4/AR emoticon because a guy who owns a M4/AR wants for nothing else... but more ammo!

I like AR guys.  They're faithful and loyal to their platform almost to a T.  I know it's got to be killing them to have you use an AK icon. 

Uh, oh, this is gonna start me laughing all over again.  I better stop before I give myself a hernia or something.

and I love ak guys, they make me laugh with how much shit they talk so they can feel better about their inferior choice  in rifles
Bursting bubbles since 2013

Ghost

  • Guest
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #108 on: September 18, 2011, 07:44:40 AM »
Guys, I'll settle this debate right here, right now.



It doesn't matter what rifle you choose, as long as you practice with it, a lot, and have a lot of ammo to feed it. And mags to put that ammo in might be a good idea.


They both seem like great platforms, and I'd be happy with either one.

Offline EJR914

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 2423
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • EJR914 Youtube Page
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #109 on: September 18, 2011, 12:38:46 PM »
Guys, I'll settle this debate right here, right now.



It doesn't matter what rifle you choose, as long as you practice with it, a lot, and have a lot of ammo to feed it. And mags to put that ammo in might be a good idea.


They both seem like great platforms, and I'd be happy with either one.


Exactly!   [URL=http://www.smileyvault.co [url=http://www.freesmileys.or

Dave_M

  • Guest
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #110 on: September 18, 2011, 10:50:22 PM »
I shot alot of steel cased stuff when I first got my AR. My rifle ate it just fine but you just gotta make sure you clean your chamber well. The only problems I had happened when I switched from steel to brass in the same session/range trip. the brass kept getting stuck in the chamber, i guess from the laquer shit that's on the steel cased stuff melted off and caked up the chamber. i don't really know for sure, but I stopped shooting steel cased and I've never had the problem again.


I have to correct this common misconception. Lacquer coating does not 'melt'. Hit up some spent casings with a blowtorch and you'll quickly see this. 'Poly' coated cases only came to the market because the US venue was so stuck in this line of thinking. Here's what really happens:

Steel cases don't have the elasticity of brass cases. This means when the round is discharged it doesn't fully form to the chamber; a small gap exists between the outside of the steel case and the chamber walls. In this gap, crap builds up. Now, along the same time period Wolf and other steel cases became more popular, the market with rife with South African battlepacks of 5.56. SA .223/5.56 is notorious for being made of relatively brittle brass. This means that when the SA brass expanded into the layer of gunk, there was often an insufficient amount of resistance on the extractor to pull out the round. Hence, the whole, 'no brass after steel'.

I myself run several rounds of brass cased ammo, to pull out some of the gunk, for every several hundred rounds of steel-cased. The Box O' Truth did an article about this years ago here:
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/edu18.htm

The rule of thumb should really be, 'Don't run [South African] brass after steel'.

If one doesn't have a properly-speced 5.56 chamber, the risk is much higher of having a stuck case. It is notable that when Hornady released their training ammunition line (Hornady bullet and powder in a primed Russian steel case) they went with lacquer coated cases (which are far far better in regards to corrosion resistance than the 'poly' coated ones). In short: Poly cases exist because Americans are ignorant.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 11:19:30 PM by Dave_M »

Offline sledge

  • Community Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2328
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #111 on: September 18, 2011, 10:59:09 PM »
In short: Poly cases exist because Americans are ignorant.

I resemble that statement.  I'd truly like to argue against any insinuation that Americans are ignorant.  Unfortunately, as a whole, we prove it to be the truth over and over again.  Obama is just the latest shining example.

I say we boycott those poly cases first.  Then move on to our other mistakes.

Great post Dave.

And 505, thanks for the cool gun sigs.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 11:01:48 PM by sledge »



In the pursuit of liberty, many will fall. In the pursuit of fascism, many will be against the wall..........   Courtesy of Xydaco

Offline EJR914

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 2423
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • EJR914 Youtube Page
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #112 on: September 20, 2011, 01:58:16 AM »
I shot alot of steel cased stuff when I first got my AR. My rifle ate it just fine but you just gotta make sure you clean your chamber well. The only problems I had happened when I switched from steel to brass in the same session/range trip. the brass kept getting stuck in the chamber, i guess from the laquer shit that's on the steel cased stuff melted off and caked up the chamber. i don't really know for sure, but I stopped shooting steel cased and I've never had the problem again.


I have to correct this common misconception. Lacquer coating does not 'melt'. Hit up some spent casings with a blowtorch and you'll quickly see this. 'Poly' coated cases only came to the market because the US venue was so stuck in this line of thinking. Here's what really happens:

Steel cases don't have the elasticity of brass cases. This means when the round is discharged it doesn't fully form to the chamber; a small gap exists between the outside of the steel case and the chamber walls. In this gap, crap builds up. Now, along the same time period Wolf and other steel cases became more popular, the market with rife with South African battlepacks of 5.56. SA .223/5.56 is notorious for being made of relatively brittle brass. This means that when the SA brass expanded into the layer of gunk, there was often an insufficient amount of resistance on the extractor to pull out the round. Hence, the whole, 'no brass after steel'.

I myself run several rounds of brass cased ammo, to pull out some of the gunk, for every several hundred rounds of steel-cased. The Box O' Truth did an article about this years ago here:
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/edu18.htm

The rule of thumb should really be, 'Don't run [South African] brass after steel'.

If one doesn't have a properly-speced 5.56 chamber, the risk is much higher of having a stuck case. It is notable that when Hornady released their training ammunition line (Hornady bullet and powder in a primed Russian steel case) they went with lacquer coated cases (which are far far better in regards to corrosion resistance than the 'poly' coated ones). In short: Poly cases exist because Americans are ignorant.


Dave_M, you just blew my mind.   :o

1000meterstare

  • Guest
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #113 on: September 28, 2011, 09:18:41 PM »
 [URL=http://www.smileyvault.coOh, I almost forgot to address the epitome and pinnacle of AR development:  the piston.  Sounds like the AR is NOW actually an AK!  Funny, my WASR-10 still doesn't need a forward assist.  OUCH!!!  Sounds like I just nailed somebody's mom, sister, favorite platform, or all of them at once!!! [url=http://yoursmiles.org/p-m

Dave_M

  • Guest
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #114 on: September 29, 2011, 12:10:30 AM »
Quote
Oh, I almost forgot to address the epitome and pinnacle of AR development:  the piston.  Sounds like the AR is NOW actually an AK!  Funny, my WASR-10 still doesn't need a forward assist.  OUCH!!!  Sounds like I just nailed somebody's mom, sister, favorite platform, or all of them at once!!!


Piston AR's aren't the pinnacle of AR design; they are a fool's errand and wasted money for most. Except in exceedingly rare instances, they are totally unneeded and do not increase reliability in the system. Furthermore, they are outclassed by newer technologies. I would place the current vertex of design on either the Knights Armament SR-15E3 or the LMT MRP (DI version).

Also, the AK has a long-stroke gas system. This means that the gas piston is directly attached to the BCG. Every AR piston design I've seen has involved a short-stroke gas system (independent op-rod which hits the BCG). Additionally, the AK isn't the first rifle developed to have a gas piston--not every gun with a gas piston is a derivative of an AK-series rifle. Obvious more advanced versions of the AK would be the Galil and Valmet.

Your WASR-10 does indeed have a forward assist--it's called the charging handle.


Offline technique

  • Death-Merchant
  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Paleo Prepper
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #115 on: September 29, 2011, 01:04:52 AM »


Also, the AK has a long-stroke gas system. This means that the gas piston is directly attached to the BCG. Every AR piston design I've seen has involved a short-stroke gas system (independent op-rod which hits the BCG).


Primary Weapon System (PWS) formerly known as AK Concepts. Long-stroke.
Honestly one of the best approaches I've seen yet, at least that I can talk about  ;D
Follow me on Instagram - technique408

Dave_M

  • Guest
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #116 on: September 29, 2011, 01:12:40 AM »


Also, the AK has a long-stroke gas system. This means that the gas piston is directly attached to the BCG. Every AR piston design I've seen has involved a short-stroke gas system (independent op-rod which hits the BCG).



Primary Weapon System (PWS) formerly known as AK Concepts. Long-stroke.
Honestly one of the best approaches I've seen yet, at least that I can talk about  ;D


Years ago, when I actually gave some consideration to this concept, I attached an SKS op-rod to an AR carrier. It worked. It was also stupid. One of these days I'll post pics of my DI AK build  :))

Either way, I think we can both agree these are all far cry's from being both the, 'pinnacle' nor AK-like.

Here's a write-up a did a while back regarding piston systems:
http://www.milcopptactical.com/piston.htm

Dave_M

  • Guest
Re: AR- 15 vs. AK-47
« Reply #117 on: September 29, 2011, 08:40:18 PM »
ADCOR Bear is a long stroke setup. So, I'll correct myself.