Author Topic: Supreme Court Made Ruling on mRNA In 2013  (Read 421 times)

Offline JohnyMac

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15169
  • Karma: +23/-0
Supreme Court Made Ruling on mRNA In 2013
« on: January 12, 2022, 02:43:51 PM »
There is something floating around the interwize stating that the SCOTUS made a ruling back in 2013, that if you are injected with a mRNA vaccine you are in part owned by the patent holder.

Here is a link to the PDF,

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf

Does anybody know anything about this? Nemo, can you read this document and make heads or tails out of it?
Keep abreast of J6 arrestees at https://americangulag.org/ Donate if you can for their defense.

Offline Nemo

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 6554
  • Karma: +17/-2
  • From My Cold Dead Hands
Re: Supreme Court Made Ruling on mRNA In 2013
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2022, 06:32:59 PM »
Short answer is the first sentence on page 2.  Basically if it exists on its own, it is not patentable.  If someone makes it, it is patentable.

Wade through the page 2 and the paragraph on page 3, which is the summary.  That should give you a basic understanding of the decision and basis.

If you know genetics you can understand most of the rest of it.  Otherwise trust me.

Nemo

Quote
Held: A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA ispatent eligible because it is not naturally occurring. Pp. 10?18.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2022, 06:40:57 AM by Nemo »
If you need a second magazine, its time to call in air support.

God created Man, Col. Sam Colt made him equal, John Moses Browning turned equality to perfection, Gaston Glock turned perfection into plastic fantastic junk.

Offline JohnyMac

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15169
  • Karma: +23/-0
Re: Supreme Court Made Ruling on mRNA In 2013
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2022, 09:34:06 PM »
Interesting Nemo. Thank you.

Thoughts folks?
Keep abreast of J6 arrestees at https://americangulag.org/ Donate if you can for their defense.

Offline FeedingFreedom

  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: Supreme Court Made Ruling on mRNA In 2013
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2022, 10:06:12 AM »
Short answer is No. The Human genome cannot be patented, even if altered. Patents cannot be issued for any human organism. Here's a couple links if you want to read further (i.e., you need a nap).

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2105.html

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep-9015-appx-l.html#aiasec33limitonissuance

https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/vaccine-transhuman-claims-patently-wrong-on-us-supreme-court-ruling/
Socialism is the religion of the imbecile.

Offline JohnyMac

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15169
  • Karma: +23/-0
Re: Supreme Court Made Ruling on mRNA In 2013
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2022, 11:33:32 AM »
Awesome! Thank you FF. I do noy care what MrsFF says about you...You are alright.  :cheers:
Keep abreast of J6 arrestees at https://americangulag.org/ Donate if you can for their defense.