i have fired more than a few rounds through an m1a, and i wouldn't want to go into any urban battle with one
i'm not assuming that the 5.56 guy has a tactical advantage, all i was trying to say is fire superiority rules, m1a takes a major hit on that
yeah there are cheaper m1a's than the springfield, but they are not very good
sure you can get cheap mags and i'm sure they will work fine if you dont use em much, but if you really bang away with that thing and put thousands or rounds through it, the springfield armory mags have been the only ones that actually hold up 100% reliable according to 4 guys that i know who really shoot theirs
60 cents a round is crazy for foreign milsurp ball ammo
5.56 costs 25cents for m855
and i think the 5.56 is a more capable round than 308
it is better for warfare, i can hunt small game, i can hunt anything on north America with it
exactly my point you only got a couple rounds through your rifle due to your inability to get to the range and MONEY that shit costs too much for you me or everyone on here i know to really train on it with
i hunt with a 22 lever gun and a 6" 357magnum or my ar15
my ar15 is good out to 550yds wtf do i need a bolt gun for?
you said your rifle wont feed all the german milsurp because your rifle needs maintenance, thats where that statement came from
not all ar's and ak's are gonna run thousands of rounds without flaw, but damn near all ak47's will and pretty much all modern ar15's that cost 750 and up will run that long without fucking up
actually it is not made as good today as it was when introduced, even the springfields are made using a weaker technology, but what i was trying to say with my original statement, what i was trying to say was that in todays world the battle rifle's use is pretty fucking limited
truth is there really isnt anything "realistic" that i cant do with an ar15 or ak47 that an m1a shines at
but there are more than a few things that the ar/ak platform excel at where the m1a is clumsy at best