presidential debate

[Kentactic]

make sure your tinfoil hats on before continuing..





Ok.... So how did obama know candy had a transcript on this event handy?

(Obama)"get the transcript"
(Candy)"fact check and give incorrect data to back up obama"
(Obama)  "Can you say that a little louder" ..
(Candy) *oh thats my que* "repeat"

Perhaps the obama administration told them to keep certain material handy for fact checking on the spot to make romney look bad? Clearly Candy had no place being a fact checker in this debate.   

Obama Scolds Romney About Libya Terrorist Attack (2012 Presidential Debate #2)

[JohnyMac]

Oh she is a 'whack job!' I and you can get the transcript in about 5 seconds by Googling it.

Hey is to "Google" now a verb?

[Outonowhere]

not exactly tin foil worth, but yes it was like seeing a 2 on 1 boxing match.  Of course this was expected from a CNN personality.

And he did NOT call it a terror attack for weeks.  The speech he referred to, he made a generalized statement concerning terror threats against America.

[special-k]

...Hey is to "Google" now a verb?

Yes... but only if it involves lubricant.  [url=http://yoursmiles.org/p-m

[Grudgie]

Whether he technically called it a terror attack or not is not the point. Nobody is arguing that the murder of Ambassodor Stevens and two of his securit were not terrorist acts. A child throwing a rock in the window and running away is a 'terrorist attack'. The point is that Obama knowingly lied to cover up why the Ambassador was there in the first place by blaming a video on a Youtube.

The debate is just pettily quibling over technicalities which makes Romney look like he somehow 'lost'. People who have actually been following this story know what Romney meant.

[Kentactic]

The point of this thread was to theorize that Obama and administration and the moderater and her staff were working together. Obama asked her to get the transcript as if he told her to have it on hand prior to the debate. He seemed to know she would have it and would be willing to help him out even though no moderater has any business checking facts on the spot. 

[Grudgie]

I thought about it and the more I did the more I thought it might have been set up. When Romney began speaking Obama was saying to 'Continue Gov.' as if encouraging him to be led into his trap. 

[EJR914]

This was much better than the real Presidential Debate.  Word.

Barack Obama vs Mitt Romney. Epic Rap Battles Of History Season 2.

[JohnyMac]

Kentactic wrote:
The point of this thread was to theorize that Obama and administration and the moderater and her staff were working together. Obama asked her to get the transcript as if he told her to have it on hand prior to the debate. He seemed to know she would have it and would be willing to help him out even though no moderater has any business checking facts on the spot. 

I am a tin foil hat wearer 'First Class.' I think it is more than likely.  [URL=http://www.smileyvault.co

[EJR914]

Dear Readers, the entire American political system is built upon lies. To wit:

? The Constitution is our guide
? The Dollar is strong
? Banking is ethical
? America must defend itself abroad
? Voting is crucial to our political system
? Social Security and Medicare will be saved
? The unemployment rate is less than 8%
? Quantitative Easing helps America
? Anyone in the military is a hero
? Iran is working toward nuclear weapons
? China is a currency manipulator
? Politicians create jobs
? Washington wants to fix the immigration policy
? Israel is our ally
? And the list goes on and on and on

The American political system REQUIRES adherents to lie. Our monetary system, which is fiat currency and fractional reserve banking regulated by the Federal Reserve, is a total fraud. Any banking system that permits, even enforces a reserve amount less than 100%, is a lie. So, if you support a system built upon lies, does it not naturally flow that you must lie to maintain the system? Truth would bring the system down.

What would Americans do if the Presidential candidates told the truth about that list above?

? The Constitution has been dead since the early 1800s.
? The Dollar is going to collapse because Washington has borrowed too much, printed too much paper money and decoupled the Dollar from any underlying hard metal. The nations of the world are rejecting the Dollar as world reserve currency.
? Fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money from thin air.
? America is going bankrupt supporting troops around the globe and funding unnecessary military technology and hardware. Over 4,000 men died in combat in the Middle East for nothing.
? Social Security and Medicare are going insolvent and will accelerate.
? The real unemployment rate in America is over 20%.
? Borrowing half of the amount Washington spends is insane.
? Military personnel that obey unlawful orders are not heroes.
? Iran is only developing fissionable materials for electric power and medical technology, and that has been proven.
? China owns Washington entirely and DC knows it.
? Only the free market creates jobs, politicians only get in the way.
? Washington and its contributors LIKE illegal workers and don?t want to change it.
? Israel manipulates the White House and Congress at will because Israel knows that Christianity wants Jesus to return as the Messiah.

More here:  http://dumpdc.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/liars/

[crudos]

I thought about it and the more I did the more I thought it might have been set up. When Romney began speaking Obama was saying to 'Continue Gov.' as if encouraging him to be led into his trap.

Of course he did. Mitt's big mouth lead him right into a dead end alley. Obama was more than happy to help him along, just like any opposing debater would. Thought it was quite a masterstroke, Mitt's playing checkers and Obama playing chess.

[EJR914]

This ain't checkers, its chess, son!  -Training Day.