PK, I'll agree with you regarding the gain of cubical antennas. However, cubical quads do have some disadvantages, which weren't mentioned, and yes I've run cubical quads. In the north country, and even some places here in the south, cubical quads can have serious problems due to ice loads. The typical cubical quad isn't overly robust, and they are more complicated to construct. Cubical quads are also three dimensional versus two dimensional yagis, so they require wider separation and a longer mast, which contributes to rotor failures.
I've never experienced matching problems with any yagi that I've installed, but the antennas are being used within their designed frequency range. Cubical quads do indeed cover a wider frequency range. Constructing a phasing harness isn't that complicated, folks just need to follow the necessary formulas, it's not rocket science, but a person needs basic math skills. Overall, yagis cost less and are generally stronger than cubical quads. For example, you don't see too many commercial VHF or UHF cubical quads, though I believe there is at least one, manufactured up in Canada.
The station here has multiple antennas systems, using both omnidirectional and directional antennas. One of my favorite antennas is a M Squared VHF eggbeater omnidirectional that can also be used for satellite comms, but it's a wire three dimensional antenna which will probably not survive an ice storm. I'd buy or make another one, if it gets destroyed. Amateur radio is frequently full of compromises, and at my location I don't have much tower height, but try to make up for it with lots of power and high gain yagi antennas. I'm in a location where it's height below average terrain.