Unchained Preppers
General Category => News & Politics => Topic started by: JoJo on March 09, 2016, 09:20:57 AM
-
A bit over my head but what I could understand Justice Thomas was protecting the 2nd amendment.
http://www.ammoland.com/2016/03/justice-thomas-speaks-out-in-the-voisine-case-part-1/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&utm_campaign=32eaa91d22-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-32eaa91d22-20774405#axzz42Phubpgj (http://www.ammoland.com/2016/03/justice-thomas-speaks-out-in-the-voisine-case-part-1/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&utm_campaign=32eaa91d22-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-32eaa91d22-20774405#axzz42Phubpgj)
-
The understanding lies in the [urlhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_10]Review on Writ of Certiorari[/url]. Take a minute folks to understand what Judge Thomas did.
In short, by tradition, there is never a Review on Writ of Certiorari (Relooking at a past ruling) without unanimous consent. Thomas stated he will not go for a review.