This page contains the active amendmants and legislation being reviewed currently as well as ones that will be up for determination.
http://www.isra.org/legislation/This page contains the Illinois Criminal Code of 1961.
http://criminalmisdemeanorcourt.com/illinois-criminal-code-offenses.html You will find this a little more than half way down. (720 ILCS 5/24-1.7)
Sec. 24-1.7. Armed habitual criminal.
(a) A person commits the offense of being an armed habitual criminal if he or she receives, sells, possesses, or transfers any firearm after having been convicted a total of 2 or more times of any combination of the following offenses:
(1) a forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of
this Code;
(2) unlawful use of a weapon by a felon; aggravated
unlawful use of a weapon; aggravated discharge of a firearm; vehicular hijacking; aggravated vehicular hijacking; aggravated battery of a child; intimidation; aggravated intimidation; gunrunning; home invasion; or aggravated battery with a firearm; or
(3) any violation of the Illinois Controlled
This is the pretext of HB1294 and the following categories don't provide as clear text as what the bill does. Regardless, this is 100% dealing with the "Criminal Code." If you fall into the category of criminal it would apply to you. Not a law abiding citizen. Though, to be fair, I can understand why some people may read it and understand it that way. The true reason to oppose this bill is for individuals who may be wrongfully charged with assault, battery, self defense, etc. from losing their firearms. In appearance it would also seem to be strict enough to apply to individuals who have negligent discharges like or ol'friend Tex Grebner. Which honestly, I'd rather that moron not be allowed to have guns. Bill HB3365 which is on the main page also helps provide a fair pretext to HB1294.
Keep in mind if these amendmants were to apply to law abiding citizens many gun companies and retailers would threaten to leave Illinois as they did in 2006. This would also be national news.