Copy, Click, Paste, Comment-- This is Important

[Nemo]

Read below and do above.

Like I said, IMPORTANT!

Nemo


From the Virginia Citizens Defense League (Va state level NRA)  VCDL.ORG

ACTION ITEM - BATFE REVIEWING BUMP STOCKS FOR POSSIBLE BAN

Bump stocks had previously been reviewed by BATFE under the Obama administration and they concluded that the device was NOT a "machine gun."

We agree.

However, after the massacre in Las Vegas, there was the usual push to "do something," and bump stocks were in the spotlight.

There was pressure for BATFE to review their previous ruling and to ban bump stocks.

In the middle of the Christmas/New Years holiday the comment period has begun for BATFE reviewing the bump stock ruling and we need to get out comments telling BATFE to leave bump stocks alone.

Whether you like the concept of bump stocks or not, we need to stand together and protect our rights.  An attack on one firearm or firearm accessory is an attack on all of them and all of us.

No sacrificial lamb will ever satiate the gun grabbers.  Every time they take something from us, nothing is given in return and they come back more empowered to take the next item, whatever that might be.

Why does someone "need" a bump stock?  For a free people it's not about needs, but about wants.  Don't let the anti-rights people divide us, ever.  They absolutely love it when one group of gun owners says another group of gun owners doesn't "need" something, such as back in 1993 when many hunters were saying no one needed an AR-15.  We were divided and we got a 10 year "assault weapon" ban.

Here is the website to go to:

https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=ATF_FRDOC_0001-0035

Click the "Comment Now!" button on the top right corner of the page.

This was my comment.  Feel free to use it as is or to modify it as you see fit:

-

It is important that rules are made based on logic, reason, facts, and law, not emotion, political correctness, or politics.

Bump stocks were already examined by the BATFE and determined NOT to be machine guns.

That was clearly the correct answer.  A semi-automatic firearm equipped with a bump stock still fires only one round with each pull of the trigger.

A person can bump fire a semi-automatic firearm with nothing more than their bare hands and the proper technique.  Others can work the trigger in a conventional fashion, but very fast, and achieve a bump stock rate-of-fire.

As long as one pull of the trigger fires one shot on a semi-automatic firearm, no accessory can be legitimately classified as a "machine gun."

[JoJo]

Done!

[Nemo]

Front page showed 14 views when I first opened this.  I hope to all that potent and powdered a dozen or so more sent a comment in.

If not, consider yourself    unless you do it by midnight on Friday.

Nemo

[grizz]

As far as the vegas shooting goes we only know he had a bunch of weapons in the room with him and not all of them had bumpstocks. No information has been released (that I know of?) to which weapons and calibers he was using.

[JoJo]

 Libtards as usual are trying to get gun control before the results are in. I've read else where some concert goers said there were helicopters shooting at the crowd but they showed up dead later on.   

[Nemo]

As far as the vegas shooting goes we only know he had a bunch of weapons in the room with him and not all of them had bumpstocks. No information has been released (that I know of?) to which weapons and calibers he was using.

That really does not matter at all.  It is simply the causal factor for the BATF reviewing and banning the bumpstocks.

Because they are reconsidering their evaluation that bump stocks needed no regulation everyone needs to challenge their ideas and fight it.

Just object because the BATF is under pressure to ban them and we can give them some cover to find their initial position was correct.

Nemo

[Erick]

Done.
The enemies of our republic never sleep but neither do we.