On the contrary, I think you have valid points. I do not think a utopia exists, or ever will exist. Humans are flawed, and will always be so. No matter the education, we will always be tempted, consciously or unconsciously, to abuse whatever power we have. I advocate government because at least this way you have certain basic requirements such as physical protection against outside groups, a more organized economic system, and an organized way for one party to address its grievances against another. I think that anarchy can do those much better, but is limited to a much smaller scale. The more people you have in a given area, the better an option at limited government is. Anarchy, IMO, seems best given an environment not unlike the American frontiers of the 18th and 19th centuries. Civilization existed, but individuals still could get away and rule themselves, and approach life and civilized groups more on their own terms. Of course, many also died at the hands of these larger groups. There are pros and cons to both.
