It could go either way. However, one huge mistake I see the militia spokesman making is not responding more descriptively when the interviewer asked under what circumstances would the militia be called into action. He doesn't have to elaborate on the resistance to tyranny part, but couldn't he say something about community preparedness? They have an organized militia that is "prepared" to resist the government, so I certainly hope they have more than just guns, ammo, and tactical training. They're going to need medical, supply, etc., skills also, and those skills directly relate to helping the community as well, something that the original militias DID do. Militias were community/village/town/city focused before they were deployed against a tyrannical government. That is probably the weakest point I see when militia guys respond to interviewers - talk about the good things that your unit trains to do for the community (preferably in conjunction with the county sheriff's office) in case of an emergency. Don't just talk about the extremely controversial and "extremist" act of training to eliminate government employees intent on enforcing unconstitutional laws.
