Author Topic: 12 Signs That Americans Who Love Liberty And Freedom Should Watch Their Backs  (Read 2774 times)

Offline Veritas

  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
  • Karma: +0/-0
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but my Kalashnikov will hurt you.

"Don't wish ill for your enemy, plan it."

Colombo

  • Guest
Double plus good comrade  [URL=http://www.smileyvault.co

Offline rah45

  • Community Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1572
  • Karma: +5/-0
  • Live Free, or Die.
Excellent article. I like his reference and listing of sources.

Offline tominphx

  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
  • Karma: +0/-0
What's wrong with what they do at NFL games? It's a private function, they can set whatever terms for entry they desire. 

Pretty much everything else is obviously wrong.
It's better to have it and not need it ...

Offline NOLA556

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 2048
  • Karma: +0/-0
What's wrong with what they do at NFL games? It's a private function, they can set whatever terms for entry they desire. 

Pretty much everything else is obviously wrong.

if it's the result of pressure from DHS then it's wrong but if NFL voluntarily requests it then you're right, it's a private function.
Rome is burning, and Obama is playing the fiddle - GAP

Offline thekiltedpatriot

  • Novice Prepper
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • Karma: +0/-0
if it's the result of pressure from DHS then it's wrong but if NFL voluntarily requests it then you're right, it's a private function.

+100

The same is true with the DHS at airports.  These facilities are NOT owned or operated by the fedgov and are being forced into conducting these searches.

Offline tominphx

  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
  • Karma: +0/-0
If the DHS and TSA where done away with, do you really think airport security would change drastically? It could even get more insane. But at least an airline could offer less security, and those who want to fly with less restrictions would have the option, and the market would decide.

I can't imagine an airline ever allowing private citizens to carry on board the way LEOs can. (after only a 4 hour course, how highly trained!)

The same goes for other private events, and locations with tight security.


Remember, the bill of rights doesn't grant anything, only recognizes, and restricts the government, not the private sector.
It's better to have it and not need it ...

STRAITJACKET

  • Guest

 Is it a good article? yes. But here lately nothing pisses me off more than the title of an article that insinuates that I should fear  this or fear that, or look out for this or that. I long for the day that the Heading of an article reads, "IF YOUR A POLITICIAN OR A COURT APPOINTED JUDGE THAT DOES'NT WALK IN LINE STEP WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, YOU SHOULD BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID."

Offline tominphx

  • Senior Prepper
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
  • Karma: +0/-0
They are afraid, and have been for quite some time.

Why do you think they have been pushing for gun confiscation for almost 80 years?

Yes, the very highest up the chain are very well protected in their ivory towers. But your average judge or prosecutor, politician, or other stooge isn't that well protected.
It's better to have it and not need it ...

STRAITJACKET

  • Guest
  I hear ya Tom, I know they are afraid and I understand the fear that they should rightly have. I just got thinking and hung up on the Title of the article. The fact  that is even a phrase being uttered disgusts me, the thought that freedom loving Americans that stand for liberty and the Constitution should have anything to fear from its government just shows how far down the path we've went. All Im saying is wouldnt it be nice to wake up some day and have the "norm" be exactly the opposite.