The D.C. Neocons Want - Need An Expanded War In Ukraine

[JohnyMac]

Back in February 2023, Lewinski was planning a Moscow attack on the one year anniversary of Russia invading Ukraine, February 24, 2022. The US D.C. Neocons said, "no". These same neocons were hoping by this time Russia would have done something kinetic that would have warranted NATO (USA) to roll into Ukraine. Russia continues to move methodically across Ukraine with no elevation of kinetics, ala nuclear.

Due to the economy, the D.C. Neocons took the leash off of Lewinski and he attacked the Kremlin using two drones. There hopes are to piss off Putin enough to launch an elevated military nastiness or a run on the Ukrainian Hryvnia (Ukrainian currency).

Today at this posting 37 hryvnia's is equal to $1.00 US Dollar.

I suspect that Putin will retaliate but it will be economic not through a heightened military nastiness. He will hit Ukraine economically as he understands what the D.C. Neocons are trying to do.

Over the next seven days, keep your eyes east towards Ukraine. If my prediction is correct, and the Ukraine economy collapses, what will the D.C. Neocons' next step be to start a full fledged war in Ukraine?

By the way, why isn't the media reporting on Ukraine anymore? Carlson was.

Stay tuned,

    

 

[Sir John Honeybucket]

of cfourse, the classic cover for an economic firestorm is generally a hot war.  It worked for The Great Depression, WW II served for cover for many of FDR's (and his commie staff ) career moves, EMERGENCY POWERS and of course the murder of millions globally we icing on the cake.  Having a major war involving NATO would give a lot of emergency powers and great media cover for the collapsing economy at home.  It can also draw the militaries of our alleged 'friends' out so much that communist Chine will be able to wage war in the Western Pacific with little or no interference from us, due to exhausted supply and logistics chains and likely more domestic terrorism here in the United States, impacting road and rail transport and factory production. 

It's not necessary for an enemy to become stronger than the United States , when it is far easier to simply make the United States weaker.  It's always easier to destroy than to build. (Just ask Joe and his spawn.)



Sir John Honeybucket

[JohnyMac]

Sir John