While we list the possibilities for disaster, our existential enemies work furiously to increase their very probability.
Yes, I believe that election fraud is real and able to move significant numbers/percentage wise in our existential enemies' favor.
Having said that, those cheats are some kind of finite (hope I'm not being too naive). Or at least suggest limits to mathematical probabilities according to private polling... (and remember... all of our government's assets are working to provide the junta's apparatchiks the latest, most accurate "read") Forget the "New York Times" or "USA Today".
Prudence requires our enemies to have plans A, B & C already scoped. Just like we should, if truth be told.
IF the junta fears the public upswell might overcome the ability to "cheat", then alternative methods of dealing with the hoi polloi must be ready and employed.
Enter the Dragon: suspensions of this, delays of that, equivalence of "marshall law", no "elections" until their "sanctity" and "purity" an be "guaranteed" to "protect the democracy". Do it for the children...
I have concluded that our would-be-rulers want to provoke kinetic response to their outrages. They plan to use such "outbursts" as a pretext to begin the process of disarming us. Count on many more Ruby Ridges and Wacos, the MSM couldn't keep up even if they didn't (which they don't).
Where this ends, who cares about prognostications based on hope?
We will simply have to see what we shall see, roll with the punches. And be the last man standing or at least the first to get back up.
