Author Topic: Sightmark Triple Duty Optic Review: link  (Read 1348 times)

Offline crudos

  • Community Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2565
  • Karma: +7/-2
  • Expect Resistance

Offline Kentactic

  • Hardcore Prepper
  • ******
  • Posts: 2942
  • Karma: +12/-0
Re: Sightmark Triple Duty Optic Review: link
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2013, 03:14:13 PM »
Based on this review its $300 wasted. Its a 2nd focal plane and the reticle and turrets dont match. The reviewer wanted a marking for windage and elevation? REALLY? Ive never even touched a windage knob after zeroing let alone confused the two. Clearly this gentlemen dosent have much scope experience. " one small problem is the mounting system sucks horribly"... Oh thats all... A scopes only as good as the rings and rail attaching it to the rifle. Two thumbs down.
Simplicity Is Ideal...

Offline APX808

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • APX R4nt5
Re: Sightmark Triple Duty Optic Review: link
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2013, 03:45:17 PM »
I'm with Kentactic, that sight sucks for long range shooting, having a mildot reticle with MOA turrets is a big NO NO

For the guys who don't get much about scopes, there is a video series called Sniper 101, check the chapters 14 to 22 they explain a lot about scopes

Here is the chapter 14 for starters
SNIPER 101 Part 14 - Scopes for Extreme Long Range Shooting - Rex Reviews