i got carried away and forgot.
I was working with a spiral graphene antenna. tested it with a network analyzer and IRL.
the frequency response was from 30MHz to 3Ghz - this limitation was my receiver/analyzer, not the paper antenna. the ISO-gain was around +7dB... across the entire scale. We'll get a polar map when we can free up some time in the anechoic chamber - that many bands may be a weekend project
all tests were RX only. TX will come later. We already know that a Cu wire antenna the same shape has internal interference and impedance problems causing the gain to be very prone to flex and deformation losses. This was not seen on the printed version unless we nearly folded the antenna back on itself.
in laymen's terms this means the 8 1/2 X 11 piece of paper with the inked antenna (printed by hand using a syringe of ink over a printed template) was better than a typical car 2M & triple band Cellular & discone antennas i compared it too. (typical gain for the magmounted type car antenna ranges from +0dB to +3dB at tuned frequencies.) Fun note - the IRL commercial FM band started my receiver clipping the signal
very nice.