Enter Syria?
I have been warning about the Syrian trigger point for a very long time. Syria?s mutual defense pact with Iran, its strong ties to Russia, the Russian naval base off its coast, the advanced Russian weaponry in it?s arsenal, its proximity to vulnerable oil shipping lanes, all make the nation a perfect catalyst for a global catastrophe. The civil war in Syria is already spreading into neighboring countries like Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon, and if one looks at the facts objectively, the entire war is a product of covert action on the part of the U.S. and its allies.
The U.S. trained, armed, and funded the insurgency using Al Qaeda operatives. Saudi Arabia has sent funding and arms as well. Israel has aided the rebels using air strikes within Syria?s borders (even though this means that the Israeli government is essentially helping their supposed mortal enemies). This war would NOT be taking place today without the express efforts of the West. Period.
If one takes more than a brief examination of the Syrian insurgency, they would find an organization of monsters. Wretched amoral wetwork ghouls whose crimes have been thoroughly documented, including the mass executions of unarmed captured soldiers, the torture and beheading of innocent civilians, the mutilation and cannibalism of dead bodies, and the institution of theological tyranny on a terrified populace. The U.S. created and unleashed these demons, and now, we the people are being asked by the White House to support them through force of arms.
But what is the goal here??
The goal, I believe, is to utterly transform the world?s political, economic, and social systems. The goal is to generate intense fear; fear that can be used as capital to buy, as the globalists call it, a ?new world order?. Syria is the first domino in a long chain of calamities; what the Rand Corporation sometimes refers to as a ?linchpin?. As I write this, the Obama Administration is moving naval and ground forces into position and clamoring in a painfully pathetic fashion to convince the American public that 90% of us are ?wrong? and that a strike on Syria is, in fact, necessary. It appears that the establishment is dead set on starting this chain reaction and accelerating the global collapse. So, if a strike does occur, what can we expect to happen over the next few years? Here is a rundown?
Newsbreak: Obama to speak on Syria at 1:15 pm Saturday at the whitehouse. Here we go. :gunner: :faint:
This is a lose-lose situation for people, both in Syria and US, and god forbids it the rest of the world.
Al Assad is a damn dictator who did god knows how many atrocities, muslims brothers and Al Quaeda aren't better.
US shouldn't give a rat ass if another country in another continent is in a civil war, chem weapons are being used or whatever, is their problem, their right as nation to screw it up as bad as they want.
Sadly, the US government already was able to distract us making the world think that US is going to Syria because of the oppressed people.
Guys, we shouldn't even consider that as an option,
1 - because US shouldn't be policing the world,
2 - because that's a fucking lie.
I'm fucking sure the interest US has in middle orient is geopolitical and economical, they don't give a flying fuck about the oppressed people in there.
... I expect my crappy health insurance to become hella better based on what I'm reading from my provider because of Obama care, or whatever it's called.O RLY?? You expect to still have a full-time job (and therefore insurance) after "obamacare" goes into effect?
I could definitely see this as a distraction tactic from the economic situation and trying to shore up the dollar.
There's a lot of sense to that line of thought, though I always try to remember that the more people you have in a conspiracy the harder it is to keep secret. This would be a pretty big number of people who'd need to be in on it - the policy makers and advisors who truly think a collapse is imminent or even are just thinking our influence is waning too much, the analysts and advisors who would have had to search the world for an appropriate conflict, the lawmakers who had to be brought on board to do the hearings and the interviews and then cast their votes. All it would take is one Snowden and the whole thing would be out in the open.
Still, that said, the idea makes a chilling kind of sense. War is expensive for a reason - it gives people work to do making bombs and bandages. It keeps the patriotic fervor going so that we hail our soldiers as heroes rather than questioning why they're in the places they're in. It eats up nightly air time that is already crunched for time for actual news (even the "good" shows have only about three or four major stories in each broadcast, with a lot of feel-good, filler crap). It certainly distracts from the debt limit/government funding issues about to hit this and next month, and the complete uselessness of our elected officials in dealing with it, Re-bumbling-cans and Demo-flats alike. It tries to show our country's morals and ethics (ha! OK, the morals and ethics that our schoolbooks say we have) are still relevant on the world stage.
I don't know - maybe, just maybe, our government is really trying to do what they collectively feel is right. I sure wouldn't bet on it, though.
though I always try to remember that the more people you have in a conspiracy the harder it is to keep secret. This would be a pretty big number of people who'd need to be in on it -
WPW, to help fathom how so many people could be in on it. Think of most of those persons in the Senate, House, and Administration as well paid employees who do what they are told. (unfortunately,they are not the people's employees.) Those employees vote the way that their paychecks tell them to. (Kind of like union members.) Maybe that will also help to explain why other legislation gets passed that has a distinct rotten smell to it.
Yep. Those politicians in power did'nt get where they are today by getting cold feet and wanting to do the right thing.